![]() ![]() But they implied they would have a harder time doing so if people from the Washington area joined. ![]() Security officials could easily monitor and prepare for trucker movements from outside the metro area, the official said. One of the officials familiar with the briefings said there was real concern Washington could be the sight of a similar protest in the coming weeks. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has invoked emergency powers in an attempt to quell those protests, and police have worked to clear the streets of the protesters. Truck drivers and others protesting vaccine requirements and other public-health measures during the Covid-19 pandemic have snarled the Canadian capital of Ottawa for three weeks. 174, 21-1449.In a statement Friday, the Capitol Police said local, state and federal law enforcement agencies as well as the District of Columbia National Guard are “aware of plans for a series of truck convoys” arriving in the city around the time of Biden’s March 1 address and are coordinating security planning.Ĭapitol Police officials briefed congressional staff on the status of those plans Friday afternoon. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. But, he said, he was confident that the union’s actions would ultimately be found to be protected by the NLRB. “Our client is entitled to just compensation for its property that the union intentionally destroyed,” he said.ĭarin Dalmat, a lawyer for the union, said in a statement that while the union was disappointed, “nothing in this decision will stop workers from exercising their federally protected rights to strike when necessary to achieve better wages, benefits, and working conditions.”ĭalmat said that in “this particular case, Glacier has found a way to prolong its meritless lawsuit” and get past a motion to dismiss. when they intentionally destroy an employer’s property,” Cheney Orr/Reuters CNN Convoy groups led by American truckers are. Weisman, Strike of Truck Drivers Makes 75,000 Jobless. People hold a flag on an overpass in Brazil, Indiana on March 1, in support of a truck convoy bound for Washington, DC. On Wednesday, the convoy was estimated to have grown to about 1,100 vehicles, according to WePatriot, which provides regular updates on the convoy through contacts with many of the organizers. Parkhursts argument that the unregulated agricultural trucking mar. 23, and is planning on arriving in the D.C. In a statement, Glacier Northwest’s lawyer, Noel Francisco, said the decision “vindicates the longstanding principle that federal law does not shield labor unions. One of the largest convoys, The People’s Convoy, started in Adelanto, Calif., on Feb. “That the drivers returned the trucks to Glacier’s facility does not do much for the Union - refraining from stealing an employer’s vehicles does not demonstrate that one took reasonable precautions to protect them,” Barrett wrote. Lawyers for the union had said that in this case the drivers were instructed to be conscientious when they walked off the job, to bring their full trucks back to Glacier’s facility and to leave the trucks’ mixing drums spinning so that the concrete would not immediately begin to harden.īarrett said that argument wasn’t persuasive. The American Truckers Freedom Convoy, a group funded by 'The Great American Patriot Party' political action committee, said it will travel beginning March 1. Then, they waited to walk off the job until the concrete was mixed and poured in the trucks,” Barrett wrote. By “reporting for duty and pretending as if they would deliver the concrete, the drivers prompted the creation of the perishable product. The union said Glacier’s lawsuit should only be allowed to go forward in state court if the federal National Labor Relations Board first found that the union’s actions were not protected by federal law.īarrett wrote that because the union did not take reasonable precautions to protect Glacier’s property, the trial court was wrong to think federal law required dismissing the lawsuit. Glacier said its lawsuit in state court should not have been dismissed at the outset. The question for the Supreme Court was about how the case should proceed. The company sued the union in state court for intentionally damaging its property the lawsuit was initially dismissed. Glacier not only had to dump the concrete but also pay for the wasted concrete to be broken up and hauled away. Glacier says the union timed the strike to create chaos and inflict damage. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |